California's Disappearing Theft Suspects
Ahead of Proposition 36 vote, state data show California is not tracking retail theft suspects after arrests
Governor Gavin Newsom announced last month that California's Organized Retail Crime Task Force (ORCT) had made more than 1,000 arrests in 2024. For more than a month, CBS News California has been trying to find out what happened to those people after their arrests.

No one - not the Governor's Office, the attorney general, nor the California Highway Patrol (CHP), which runs California's task force - could tell us how many of the people arrested for retail theft were sentenced, let alone how many showed up to court, went to jail, received treatment, or re-offended. None of the agencies could even provide the names of those 1000+ people, so we could not independently track them down.

The CHP did provide arrest statistics, which reveal that out of the 1,126 arrests made by the Organized Retail Crime Task Force as of early October, more than half (684) were cite-and-releases, which means those offenders received the equivalent of the ticket and a notice to appear in court. District Attorneys say many of those people never show up in court.

A week before California voters decide on the tougher-on-crime Proposition 36, Gov. Newsom held a virtual news conference Monday to announce that more than 10,000 arrests over the past year by local law enforcement agencies statewide. These arrests were for various crimes, but he attributed them to the hundreds of millions of dollars California invested in cracking down on organized retail theft (ORT) last year.

Newsom awarded approximately $267 million worth of grants to 55 California cities and counties in October 2023. The governor said that money "has generated 10,128 arrests and counting just from the local law enforcement efforts." Of those arrests there were "nearly 8,000 for organized retail theft," according to the governor's office. cbsnews.com


Police Are Solving Fewer Crimes
Crime debate misses key point: Police have more resources, but are solving fewer crimes
Here's a potentially game-changing fact that has been completely absent from the virulent debate over Proposition 36 (the ballot measure that could roll back many of Proposition 47's criminal justice reforms): California has not gotten softer on crime during the reform era, but tougher.

An arrested person in California has considerably higher odds of being incarcerated today (20.2%) than in 2013 (18.5%), the year before Proposition 47 passed, or in 2010 (17.7%), before reforms began. This is clear from California's Department of Justice, local jail, and state prison statistics.

So, are Californians mistaken to believe that many individuals are "getting away with crime," particularly retail theft? No. But everyone is wrong about why that is.

The reason is that, despite being given more resources, law enforcement across California is solving vastly fewer crimes today than in the past. That means DAs (liberal and conservative alike) have far fewer arrested persons to prosecute.

While DAs and courts have gotten tougher, police and sheriff agencies have gotten much softer on crime. Law enforcement's "crime clearance" (solving) rate has plummeted by over half since 1990.

On average, each sworn officer arrests nearly 70% fewer people today than officers did 30 years ago. In 1990, the average officer arrested 33 people; in 2010,19; in 2023, just 10. Per-officer arrests plummeted even though California's crime decline has left officers with hundreds of thousands fewer reported crimes annually to investigate. Reforms are not responsible for the growing failure of police to solve crimes. Law enforcement clearance rates began plunging 20 years before California's recent reforms began in 2010.

It's a mystery why law enforcement efficiency has fallen so drastically even amid large increases in funding and fewer crimes to solve. Californians spend $230 more per person annually on law enforcement in constant, inflation-adjusted dollars today than in 1990. pressenterprise.com


The View from the Other Side
Myths and Realities: Prosecutors and Criminal Justice Reform

There is no clear relationship between pro-reform prosecutors and increased crime.

Prosecutors play a vital role in the criminal justice system, determining not just which cases to pursue but also what charges to file and penalties to seek. Over the past decade, some prosecutors have developed approaches that aim to reduce racial and economic disparities and unjust outcomes in the legal system - such as excessive sentences or the criminalization of poverty through cash bail - while preserving public safety.

Far from a unified group, these prosecutors bring many different approaches to their work. They span the political spectrum and are found in urban and rural jurisdictions alike. They are often grouped under the label "progressive prosecutors" or "reform-minded prosecutors." For the purposes of this analysis, we use the term "pro-reform prosecutors" to indicate chief district attorneys, county attorneys, commonwealth attorneys, and state attorneys who campaigned on or promised to reimagine the role of their office to broadly reduce unjust disparities in the justice system and decrease unnecessary incarceration.

Some critics have alleged that pro-reform strategies have driven increases in crime. We evaluate those claims, drawing on recent crime data and an understanding of how the criminal justice system works in practice, and find that these claims lack support. In fact, there is no evidence that pro-reform prosecutors are responsible for crime rising or falling. brennancenter.org


CA's ORC Task Force Making More Progress
Hammer comes down on burglars, retail thieves
Ventura had 20 commercial burglaries in August and 10 in September, according to the crime map released by the Ventura Police Department. While these numbers fluctuate, detectives on the Ventura County Organized Retail Theft Task Force are on a mission to combat organized retail, vehicle and cargo theft to prevent an estimated $10 million in yearly losses.

"It started last year in October, but we didn't really get going until mid-April," said Sgt. Baltazar Tapia who serves on the task force. "It lets people know that we're serious. We're not LA County. We're trying to be like Orange County, with their no-nonsense approach toward crime, and we arrest everybody. Whether it's a misdemeanor or not, they end up going to jail."

The latest blitz operation by the task force occurred the weekend of Oct. 4 at the Camarillo Premium Outlets, and resulted in the arrests of 14 adults and one juvenile, where an estimated $23,000 in stolen property was recovered, along with a stolen vehicle, around 90 grams of methamphetamine and several types of burglary tools.

"That takes weeks of planning just because we need the personnel," Tapia said of the operation, adding that cities are contacted to secure the right number of officers for the operation. ojaivalleynews.com
 

Homicides are finally and significantly falling in Oakland

Data check: Mass shootings in 2024
 

Training Is Key to Emergency Prep
Employees Say 25% of Companies Not Prepared for Emergencies

Poor training is a major issue according to Fusion survey.

When asked about the biggest threats their companies face, 51% employees said cyber threats/attacks, 33% said massive tech failures and 33% said natural disaster, according to a recent survey from Fusion Risk Management.

To address these threats most companies have written emergency preparedness plans, and the survey of 1,000 employees found this to be the case. Seventy-six have access to a written plan. Looking at specific events, 83% had plans for natural disasters, 65% for cyber threats, and 62% had plans for active shooter events.

When asked how often the emergency preparedness plans were updated the response is as follows:

• Annually -- 53%
• Not regularly tested or updated -- 28%
• Twice a year -- 9%
• Once every two years -- 6%
• Every three years -- 4%

Another method to prepare for emergencies is to use drills or simulations. The survey found that 76% of employees participated in natural disaster drills, while 43% were involved in active shooter drills and 28% experienced cyber attack simulations.

Even with all of these preparation methods available, the survey found that one in five employees say they received no emergency preparedness training at all. ehstoday.com


More Walgreens Job Cuts
Walgreens to lay off over 250 people

The decision regarding the support center roles follows a recent announcement that the pharmacy retailer plans to close 1,200 stores over the next three years.

As part of a move to "further" its focus on the company's core retail pharmacy business, Walgreens is laying off 256 employees who filled support center roles, a spokesperson confirmed to Retail Dive on Wednesday. Affected employees will receive severance pay and outplacement support, the company said.

"While decisions like these are always difficult, we believe this action is necessary to position us to rapidly respond to the changing external environment so we can best serve the millions of patients and customers who depend on us every day for their healthcare needs," a Walgreens spokesperson said in an email. "We are grateful for the many contributions by team members who will be leaving, and we are committed to supporting them as much as possible during this transition."

This week's announcement is the pharmacy retailer's latest round of job cuts over the last year. In February, the company laid off 145 people, most of whom were part of the corporate workforce. And last November, Walgreens cut 267 people, or about 5% of its corporate workforce at the time. retaildive.com


Wayfair to lay off 218 employees as it plans to close returns center

Talk of a 7-Eleven Takeover Has Japan Worried About the Rice Balls
 

How Will The New President Impact Cybersecurity Policies?
As presidential election looms, disparate approaches to cyber policy come into focus

Government officials and security leaders are hoping the nation's need for cyber resilience will stand on bipartisan cooperation and transcend partisan politics regardless of the election results.

With less than a week left before the November presidential election, the world is on edge as the potential outcome could signal key changes in U.S. cyber policy.

While the contrast in the two major presidential candidates is stark, there is a hope that no matter the outcome, U.S. national policy on cybersecurity will maintain a level of stability far beyond those in other areas of government.

"First and foremost, I think both potential administrations will take cybersecurity, and the need to protect our critical infrastructures in cyberspace, very seriously," said Mark Montgomery, executive director of CSC 2.0 and senior director at the Center for Cyber and Technology Innovation at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.

There is a broad consensus on the need for robust cyber protections and more resilient infrastructure, but the respective presidential candidates are likely to divert from each other on the role of government in enforcing security policy and the willingness to engage international partners to cooperate on key policy objectives.

"I think from my perspective, the broader issue is more about the overall tone and approach the administrations would take," said Michael Daniel, president and CEO of the Cyber Threat Alliance.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said it expects a continuance of current cybersecurity policies no matter which presidential candidate wins in November. The group has pushed back against key regulatory issues in a number of areas, including Securities and Exchange Commission's enforcement of cyber disclosure rules. cybersecuritydive.com


Choosing CISOs Wisely
How to Find the Right CISO

Great CISOs are in short supply, so choose wisely. Here are five ways to make sure you've made the right pick.

The artificial intelligence (AI) investment cycle we are currently in will drive new levels of cybersecurity risk in pretty much every organization, making the cybersecurity chief a CEO's most important current hire. Great chief information security officers (CISOs) - who blend technical, strategic, board-level communication, and leadership skills - are in high demand and short supply, and with technology constantly changing, the cybersecurity skill set is changing, too.

Attracting the Best

How do CEOs, their executive teams, and their HR partners attract the best of the market? Here are a few ways.

1. Level and structure the role appropriately
2. Educate your board
3. Think about both defensive and offensive tactics
4. Build and demonstrate a change management capability
5. Involve the board in the interview process darkreading.com


New CEO Named After Cyberattack
MoneyGram replaces CEO, naming former Walmart executive to the role

The money transfer company named the new CEO just weeks after a cyberattack led to a systemwide shutdown of its services for several days.

MoneyGram is changing its CEO just weeks after a cyberattack led to a systemwide shutdown of its international money transfer services for about five days last month.

MoneyGram disclosed that sensitive customer data had been stolen during the attack. Meanwhile, some customers were left wondering about the fate of their money transfers as MoneyGram worked through a backlog of orders.

A spokesperson for the company said by email that the CEO switch wasn't connected to last month's outage. "This announcement is not related to the recent cyber issue," the spokesperson said. "The leadership transition is the result of a several-months long process led by the MoneyGram Board of Directors."

The spokesperson declined to provide an update on the cyberattack, or the impact from it. cybersecuritydive.com


Google on scaling differential privacy across nearly three billion devices

Fortinet finds more malicious IPs linked to widely exploited zero-day