Loss Prevention Strategies for Retailers

3 Best Ways to Positively Impact Your Bottom Line

Implementing the right loss prevention strategy for your retail business is as crucial now than it was ever before. For many retailers, both large and small, inventory shrinkage continues to affect the bottom line more and more significantly, which unfortunately has led to some businesses having to close their doors. Ultimately, the answer to this problem lies in proper loss prevention strategies, but the ambiguity of finding the right one for your business has led many retailers down a rabbit hole of asset protection solutions that simply don’t deliver.

We will cover some of the best ways to identify the right strategies for your business. First let’s look at why inventory shrinkage is such a problem for retailers everywhere.

How Inventory Shrinkage Impacts Retailers’ Bottom Line

Inventory shrinkage is the amount of inventory that is lost by a retailer due to external or internal causes, whether that’s theft, merchandise damage, or miscounts.

Inventory shrinkage is largely unavoidable, at least to some extent. The National Retail Federation reported that, on average, retailers lost 1.6% in sales due to shrinkage in 2022. Even the most vigilant shop owners can’t account for every situation where asset loss occurs, but that doesn’t mean the margin by which it happens can’t be reduced. Especially as it relates to theft and organized retail crime, there are many different methods retailers can use to mitigate the impact shrink has on their bottom line.

Alongside theft, loss prevention strategies can also benefit other operational areas. At the end of the day, that means retailers will be increasing the return they get from their sales efforts, all while limiting how much is lost in the process.

Retail Loss Prevention – Indispensable Strategies to Incorporate

While there are many different methods for strengthening your loss prevention efforts, there are a few strategies that make up the backbone of asset protection.

These strategies include video surveillance, point-of-sale integration, and employee training.
 

Read More



 

The ORC 'First Responders'
States as the “first-responders” in the ORC crisis

By the D&D Daily staff

As organized retail crime (ORC) continues to affect retailers nationwide, states are increasingly stepping up where federal legislation has yet to gain traction. From new task forces to tougher aggregation laws, many state governments are treating ORC as a coordinated, multi-jurisdictional threat rather than isolated incidents of theft.

In Virginia, lawmakers enacted one of the most comprehensive ORC statutes in the country. The law allows prosecutors to aggregate thefts over 90 days—across multiple stores and jurisdictions—when the total value exceeds $5,000. That approach helps authorities pursue ringleaders who previously evaded felony charges by spreading out lower-value thefts.

Michigan has also taken an aggressive stance. Attorney General Dana Nessel launched the state’s “FORCE Team” (Focused Organized Retail Crime Enforcement), a statewide unit that partners with retailers, local law enforcement and federal agencies. The team has already recovered stolen merchandise and disrupted fencing operations, including those that move stolen goods online.

California, long seen as a test case in retail-theft policy, has also recalibrated its approach. After Proposition 47 reduced many theft offenses to misdemeanors in 2014, lawmakers later granted prosecutors more flexibility to charge repeat or organized thefts as felonies. A new state task force now works with retailers and local police to track repeat offenders and coordinate prosecutions.

Other states are following suit. Florida, Texas, and Illinois have proposed or passed measures defining organized retail theft separately from shoplifting, creating enhanced penalties for operating theft rings, and improving data-sharing between retailers and law enforcement.

The common thread across these state efforts is collaboration and definition. Clearer statutes make it easier to distinguish between lone offenders and coordinated networks, while public-private task forces allow real-time intelligence sharing.

Although Congress has considered national legislation—such as the Combating Organized Retail Crime Act—state actions currently represent the front line. These “laboratories of enforcement” are experimenting with policy solutions that may eventually shape a unified national strategy.

For now, the message from state capitals is clear: retailers can’t wait for Washington.


Auror's New Retail Crime Fighting Tool Makes More Headlines
Auror launches facial recognition tool for retail crime prevention and safety

'Subject Recognition' allows retailers to integrate their own data on serious repeat offenders

Auror has introduced a facial recognition product called Subject Recognition aimed at helping retailers tackle violent and organized retail crime.

The New Zealand supplier of retail crime prevention technology announced in September that it was preparing to offer a biometric matching tool to scan the faces of shoppers entering the store against a watchlist of known risky individuals.

The new Subject Recognition solution allows retailers to integrate their own data on serious repeat offenders with facial recognition technology (FRT), enabling early alerts when high-risk individuals enter a store. Auror says the system is designed with strict safeguards to ensure it is used solely for crime prevention and safety.

Auror CEO and Co-founder Phil Thomson emphasized that the technology is built with privacy and ethical use at its core. “Subject Recognition cannot in any way be used for tracking, monitoring or profiling people,” he said.

“Like all of our services, it prohibits retailers from entering sensitive information like ethnicity, race and religion, which is a key safeguard that reduces human bias, improves evidence-based decision-making, and enhances privacy.”

The tool works by instantly discarding biometric data and images that do not match a retailer’s list of known offenders. Even when a match occurs, biometric data is never stored, and human oversight is required for all decisions, according to Auror. It aligns with the company’s commitment to responsible technology use and evidence-based crime prevention.   biometricupdate.com


Law Enforcement Puts Eyes in the Sky to Fight Cargo Theft Networks
Cook Co. sheriff's team tackling urgent threat from organized crime networks stealing railroad cargo

Cook County sheriff's new helicopter seen as vital crime-fighting asset

Theft from rail cars costs consumers billions of dollars every year. Described as dangerous and costly, lawmakers say these sophisticated criminal networks are an urgent threat. Most nights, as trains pass through Chicago and the suburbs, organized bandits board moving trains to steal whatever cargo the rail cars are carrying. The head of the Cook County Sheriff's Organized Retail Crime Team says it's an everyday thing.

Before sunrise on Sept. 24, the I-Team went out with the unit on a joint operation with Cook County Sheriff police and Norfolk Southern. Law enforcement eyes in the sky spotted several people running toward the railroad tracks in Englewood.

Norfolk Southern Railroad Police used drones to monitor their property. "They steal boxes out of containers," Commander Ware told the I-Team. The Cook County Sheriff's Organized Retail Crime Team works with the railroad police to catch those committing crimes.

Bolt cutters were found near the tracks, along with dozens of boxes thrown from the train, left behind by the thieves. "We have to utilize drones, helicopters," said Sheriff Dart. "Logistically, this is tricky, and that's why, to be honest with you, the drones and the helicopter are really helpful. A: they can get there in a hurry, and B: the footage they can get both for prosecuting later on."

Equipped with high powered cameras and a comprehensive mapping system, the new Cook County sheriff's police helicopter brings an array of advanced technology to the county's crime-fighting arsenal.  abc7chicago.com

 
Do Election Results Signal A Shift Back Toward Criminal Justice Reform?
Election Results Signal Shift in Public Safety Policy

By the D&D Daily staff

Tuesday’s elections delivered several outcomes tied directly to crime, prosecution, and public safety policy — and most leaned toward reform over rollback.

In New York City, Zohran Mamdani was elected mayor, becoming the youngest in over a century and signaling continued support for progressive public-safety approaches focused on prevention and social investment rather than “tough-on-crime” rhetoric.

Meanwhile, voters reaffirmed that direction in key district attorney races. Reform-minded incumbents Alvin Bragg (Manhattan) and Larry Krasner (Philadelphia) held on, while Democrat Joe Khan flipped the Bucks County, PA DA’s seat — ending years of GOP control and giving Democrats new footing in a region that’s often a bellwether for suburban crime politics.

Elsewhere, Maine voters approved Question 2, enacting an extreme-risk protection order (“red flag”) law allowing law enforcement and families to petition courts to remove firearms from individuals deemed dangerous — a move that could influence similar proposals in other states.

Taken together, the results suggest a recalibration in the national crime debate: local voters increasingly favor prevention-driven policies and data-guided prosecution strategies over punitive crackdowns.

For the retail and loss-prevention industry, these shifts could reshape partnerships with prosecutors’ offices and local police — with a growing emphasis on collaboration, analytics, and early-intervention models rather than pure enforcement headlines.


How CPD staffing shortages are leaving holes in crime dashboard data

Urbana sees drop in violent crime but homicide rate surges, community seeks solutions