Former Netflix VP IT Orchestrated Over a Dozen
Kick-Back Schemes
This guy
was out of control - No wonder he was caught.
Former Netflix Executive Sentenced To 30 Months For Bribes And Kickbacks From
Netflix Vendors
Jury Earlier Returned 28 Guilty Verdicts
Convicting Michael Kail of Fraud and Money Laundering for Pay-To-Play Payments
from Tech Startups Seeking Netflix Contracts
SAN
JOSE –Michael Kail, the
former Vice President of IT
Operations at Netflix,
was sentenced today to 30 months in federal prison for his convictions for
honest services wire, mail fraud, and money laundering, announced Acting United
States Attorney Stephanie M. Hinds, Federal Bureau of Investigation Craig D.
Fair, and IRS-Criminal Investigation Special Agent in Charge Mark H. Pearson.
Kail was also ordered to forfeit $700,000, pay a $50,000 fine, and serve a three
term of supervision upon release from prison. The sentence was handed down by
the United States District Judge Beth Labson Freeman.
Kail was indicted April 26, 2018, and charged with nineteen counts of wire
fraud, three counts of mail fraud, and seven counts of money laundering, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 (wire fraud), 1341 (mail fraud), 1346 (honest
services fraud), and 1957 (money laundering).
On April 30, 2021, after a three-week trial, a jury returned guilty verdicts on
28 of the 29 counts charged. The jury also made findings to support the
forfeiture of property Kail had purchased with the proceeds of his fraud.
“Bribery and kickbacks are pernicious crimes that stifle Silicon Valley’s
culture of competitive innovation,” said Acting United States Attorney Stephanie
M. Hinds. “Michael Kail used his highly compensated Netflix position to siphon
cash and valuable stock options from his tech vendors, the same vendors whose
Netflix contracts he signed and whose technologies he pushed his teams to use.
Such crimes come with a cost, as reflected by the prison sentence that Kail will
now serve.”
“As alleged in the indictment, Mr. Kail chose which IT contracts were awarded by
Netflix according to how he was able to bribe those companies to provide him
with financial compensation, rather than choosing them on their merit,” said FBI
San Francisco Special Agent in Charge Craig D. Fair. "Mr. Kail not only
defrauded Netflix, but he also allowed for a ‘pay-to-play’ scheme, which he
concocted, to take precedence over the free and fair competitive business
environment that drives our economy."
“Mr. Kail’s greed to enrich himself cost Netflix and its shareholders money and
property by agreeing to contracts for goods and services beyond what the company
needed or would have paid for,” stated IRS-Criminal Investigation Special Agent
in Charge Mark H. Pearson. “Mr. Kail abused a position of trust and facilitated
a scheme that benefited himself. IRS-Criminal Investigation is committed to
uncovering these heinous acts of greed and prosecute such malevolent crimes.”
Kail, 52, of Los Gatos, was employed at Netflix as the Vice President in charge
of IT Operations from 2011 until July 2014. Netflix policies prohibited
conflicts of interest by its employees by its Code of Ethics and its “Culture
Deck,” which required the disclosure of actual or apparent conflicts of interest
and the reporting of gifts from entities seeking to sell products or services to
the company.
Kail, as Netflix’s Vice President of IT Operations, approved the contracts to
purchase IT products and services from smaller outside vendor companies and
authorized payments to them. Evidence produced at trial proved that
Kail solicited and received
bribes and ‘kickbacks’ from nine tech companies
providing products or services to Netflix. In exchange, Kail approved millions
of dollars in contracts for goods and services provided by them to Netflix.
Kail received over $500,000
and stock options from
the outside companies. He used his kickback payments in multiple ways, including
to pay his personal expenses and to buy a home in Los Gatos, California.
Kail facilitated the payments, the evidence at trial showed, by creating and
controlling a limited liability corporation called Unix Mercenary, LLC. The LLC
was created on February 7, 2012, and it had no employees and no business
location. Kail was the sole signatory to its accounts.
Two days before Unix Mercenary was registered with the California Secretary of
State, Kail signed a Sales Representative Agreement to receive cash payments
from Netenrich, Inc., amounting to 12% of any billings from Netenrich to Netflix
for staffing and IT services. Later in 2012, Kail’s Unix Mercenary began to
receive 15% of all billing payments that VistaraIT, LLC, a wholly owned company
of Netenrich, received from Netflix. From 2012 to 2014, Netenrich paid Unix
Mercenary approximately $269,986, and VistaraIT paid Unix Mercenary
approximately $177,863.
These payments stopped in late 2014, after Kail left Netflix.
Evidence at trial showed that several more companies paid Kail. Neither
Netenrich, Vistara, nor any of the other companies were charged with criminal
conduct.
Only Kail was charged with
devising the criminal scheme that defrauded Netflix.
In 2013, the trial evidence showed, Platfora, Inc. sought to do business with
Netflix. In June 2013 – at a time Kail was seeking to buy his expensive Los
Gatos residence – he met with Platfora employees and signed an evaluation
agreement for Netflix engineers to test Platfora’s product, a data analytics
software program. On July 13, 2013, Kail met with Platfora’s CEO for drinks and
later thanked him in an email saying, “I look forward to helping you in both a
Netflix and Advisory capacity.” Two days later, Kail signed an “advisory”
agreement with Platfora that provided him with the right to purchase up to
75,000 options, approximately .25% of the company. Shortly thereafter, Kail
provided Platfora with Netflix’s internal information about Platfora’s
competitors’ prices. In September 2013, while he was a compensated “advisor” to
Platfora, Kail signed, on behalf of Netflix, a multi-stage $250,000 per year
contract with Platfora. Internally, Kail urged his Netflix employees to use the
product, despite their satisfaction with a competing product for which Netflix
was already paying. When an inquiry from the Netflix CEO ensued, Kail falsely
denied that he was formally working with Platfora. Kail resigned from his
advisory position at Platfora the following week.
Additional evidence showed that Kail received payments or compensation from
other companies doing business with Netflix. In June 2012, he became an
“advisor” to and received options for shares from the company Sumo Logic, Inc.
The next month, Kail authorized and signed, on behalf of Netflix, a vendor
agreement between Netflix and Sumo Logic. The agreement led to over $300,000 in
payments by Netflix, approved by Kail, to Sumo Logic. Kail then approved a
further $800,000 two-year contract with Sumo Logic.
Similarly, trial evidence showed Kail received $5,000 per month consulting for
Netskope, Inc., and also received options to purchase 106,000 shares of Netskope
stock options. Kail authorized Netflix to enter a $112,500 contract with
Netskope just weeks before Kail resigned from Netflix. Kail also purchased, on
behalf of Netflix, a small amount of storage from Maginatics, Inc., and then
became an “advisor” to Maginatics, allowing him to purchase up to 30,000 shares.
Kail thereafter increased Netflix’s purchase of storage from Maginatics by
tenfold. Kail made approximately $120,000 when Maginatics was sold the next
year. Kail also was promised stock options in the company ElasticBox, Inc., and
thereafter signed a June 2013 Netflix order for a $600,000, 3-year subscription
to ElasticBox’s cloud services. Later that year, he signed an additional
$850,000 contract for more cloud services. Kail also accepted an “advisor”
position with Numerify, Inc. in February 2014 that provided him an early option
to purchase 36,000 shares. Three months later Kail, on behalf of Netflix, signed
an $85,000 subscription agreement for Numerify’s software. Also in February
2014, Kail signed a $120,000 contract with Docurated, Inc., which had previously
compensated him with two rounds of options, some of which Kail had already
exercised.
The evidence at trial further showed that Netflix IT employees involved with
testing some of these products did not know that many of the startups’ software
was being paid for by Netflix; rather, they assumed many of the products were
unpaid “pilots” of untested software, a routine practice in the tech industry.
The employees further did not know that Kail was being paid by the companies.
United States District Judge Beth Labson Freeman further ordered Kail to
surrender on March 8, 2022, to begin serving his prison sentence.
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Colin Sampson, Kyle Waldinger, Christopher Kaltsas, and
Daniel Kaleba (former) prosecuted the case with the assistance of Laurie Worthen.
The prosecution is the result of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation.
justice.gov
|